Verified models are of higher quality as they have passed CGT Standard technical and visual checks, making them more professional-grade 3D assets.

Currently just a bunch nonsense, for example, verification checks for metalness map on models that doesn't have metal parts/not made out of metal but don't check for AO wich every PBR model should have, that's optional... It checks for assigned materials even if box "materials" isn't ticked. It check if geometry is non-manifold on low poly models that are created exclusively for games... There is more... but If you try to justify verification, you will just end up with an unoptimized asset when it comes to real time/game models.

Hello Tobias,
I noticed that you were a bit more concerned with it than I was :/
At first glance, as a small modeler, you think it's fair and actually useful for the site and its modeler.
It's good that you address the problems that bother you, I didn't notice them right away.

Enrico

well, such inconsistencies happen when you rely on google translator

Since I don't speak English, I let google translator translate it for me, but everyone knows her except her :) but you don't know her any other way, Mr. Rieper, not her little modeler. send me a link to your great stuff, i'm interested now, but what great stuff you make. I have no idea, that's why.

p.s. CGtrader is cool and doesn't stand still in development, it's completely normal that there are minor errors and the developers can only learn from them. As a hobby modeler, I feel at home here, thank you cgtrader!

if you want to "help buyers identify high-quality models" than of course nothing against it,
but please on the base of a high-quality verification algorythm in first place, and not on a faulty, till now completely buggy, low-quality verification algorythm.